Deconstructing First Principles of Payments: How Can Stablecoins Unlock a Trillion-Dollar Opportunity?
Original Article Title: A First Principles Breakdown of the Crypto Payments Stack
Original Article Author: @proofofnathan
Original Article Translation: zhouzhou, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: This article explores the huge potential of stablecoins in the payment space, suggesting that stablecoins will surpass traditional payment systems due to being more efficient, faster, and cheaper. The article introduces the various layers of the crypto payments stack, from consumer wallets and payment providers to the financial integration layer, such as Banking as a Service and over-the-counter trading platforms. The application of stablecoins has not only boosted financial firms' profits but also improved user experience, driving the adoption of crypto payments. Ultimately, the core role of stablecoins in crypto payments will drive nearly all blockchains towards the payments space.
The following is the original content (slightly rephrased for better readability):
It's not just because stablecoins' supply has exceeded $230 billion, or that Circle has filed for an IPO, or that I often say, "It's already here."
It's because stablecoins are fundamentally disrupting the payments industry, and this disruption will continue at an exponential pace.
My core thesis is simple: Stablecoins will replace traditional payment methods because they are better, faster, and cheaper.

However, "payment" is a broad concept. Today's payment system is still dominated by traditional payment networks, banks, and fintech companies, each playing different roles in the payment structure of Web2.
While stablecoins offer a more efficient, highly available alternative, today's payment stack is gradually replicating the complexity of Web2 systems—this is why it is necessary for us to break it down.
Currently, hundreds of companies are building stablecoin-based payment networks or establishing complementary infrastructure alongside them.
@Dberenzon put together a fantastic chart that breaks down the on-chain payment ecosystem into nine different subdomains, and below is that chart.

What Dmitriy provides is a deep and somewhat technical breakdown, while entities like Pantera in "The Trillion-Dollar Opportunity" take a more macro view, dividing the entire payment system into four layers.

In this article, I attempt to reframe the payment stack in a crypto-native, first principles-based manner. Of course, the classification methods proposed by individuals such as Dmitriy and Pantera remain highly valuable, providing a good framework from another perspective.
For a better understanding, I see the structure of the entire payment stack as a vertical path—where the top is one type of user and the bottom is another type of user. And I believe the ultimate achievement of the payment stack is to allow billions of users to seamlessly access the crypto system, even unknowingly.
Crypto Payments Stack
Starting from first principles, a stablecoin is a token on the blockchain that represents a fiat currency unit, with the most common being pegged to the US Dollar.
There are several types of stablecoins, including:
· Fiat-backed, such as USDT
· Crypto-backed, such as DAI
· Synthetic, such as USDe
The most dominant type is fiat-backed stablecoins. These stablecoins are backed by highly liquid assets such as US Treasuries, cash, and equivalents, held in reserves by custodians at a 1:1 ratio. Therefore, at the bottom layer of the payment stack, traditional banks and payment systems still exist.
As mentioned earlier, stablecoins are disrupting the traditional payment system because they are better, faster, and cheaper. This has not only increased the profit margins of fintech and payment companies but has also provided end-users with a better experience. Therefore, from a user perspective, consumers are at the topmost layer of the payment stack.
In conclusion, the current payment stack can be roughly understood as follows:
(An illustrative diagram will be shown here)

Now, let's look at the most core use case in the payment stack. We have seen that one of the highest user retention use cases in the crypto industry is actually the "off-ramp"—converting cryptocurrency to fiat currency.
While the concept of an "on-ramp" (converting fiat into crypto) is also common, the predominant need has always been the ability to easily spend crypto assets, especially stablecoins.
In the payment stack we are building, on/off-ramp service providers sit right in the middle.

Above the on/off-ramp service providers is a section primarily focused on consumers or tools that support consumer usage, which I refer to as the **"Consumer Serving Layers".
Below them — from on/off-ramp to traditional banks — lies the part that integrates stablecoins into the traditional financial system, which I call the "Financial Integration Layers".
It is worth noting that the number of layers in the Consumer Serving Layers is much greater than in the Financial Integration Layers.
The reason is simple: building a Financial Integration Layer often requires licensing, compliance processes, and highly structured operations. Consumer Serving Layers can directly leverage the services and contractual relationships established in the lower layers to rapidly build on top of them.
Of course, there may be other modules in the Consumer Serving Layers, but here I have only selected the key parts in the entire payment stack that have clear functionality, well-defined dependencies, and a crucial role to explain.
Consumer Serving Layers

From the consumer's perspective, the first step into the crypto payment stack is a wallet.
A wallet is not just a tool for storing crypto assets; it is actually the gateway to the entire "save, spend, earn" experience.
Modern wallets usually have various functions, such as debit card payments, virtual bank accounts, peer-to-peer transfers, etc., designed to meet users' diverse scenario needs.
There are already a wide range of wallet products on the market, some targeting global users and others focusing on specific regional markets.
Building a wallet is actually very complex
It involves integrating multiple services and requires high-level security measures to prevent hacking attacks.
Therefore, many teams choose to rely on Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) providers. These WaaS solutions have been audited, battle-tested, and usually integrate infrastructure such as on/off-ramp services, issuer interfaces, and more.
In order to get consumer wallets truly "running," they also need to rely on various B2B stablecoin payment service providers, with key modules including:
· Invoice services: allow users to invoice their employer in crypto or fiat, with the platform receiving the payment, converting on demand, and then depositing into the user's wallet.
· Payment streaming: as companies globalize and employees are distributed worldwide, these platforms support regular stablecoin payroll, especially useful in countries where local bank access is not available.
· Card issuers: as user spending shifts from cash to electronic payments, encrypted cards become increasingly important. These issuing entities usually partner with Visa, Mastercard, enabling wallets to have the ability to "swipe card" for real-world transactions.
Compliance is also crucial, and to safeguard user funds, most platforms integrate comprehensive compliance tools at the wallet layer, including:
· KYC/AML (Know Your Customer/Anti-Money Laundering)
· On-chain fraud detection services
These compliance service providers play a significant role in the consumer service layer, both ensuring platform compliance and enhancing user trust.
Additionally, peer-to-peer payment networks are also part of the consumer layer. These networks bypass traditional payment pathways, directly connecting users and merchants for encrypted and fiat transaction exchanges.
P2P payments are widely adopted in some developing countries, but compared to the overall payment stack, they are less efficient with smaller transaction volumes, serving more as a complementary solution to traditional channels. Finally, the on/off-ramp aggregators sit at the bottom of the consumer service layer.
They consolidate multiple on/off-ramp services into a single unified API, allowing wallet developers to automatically choose solutions with faster speeds, lower fees, and better regional coverage, enhancing user experience.
Financial Integration Layers

Transitioning to Financial Integration Layers brings us to the "backbone" of the entire crypto payment stack.
In the traditional payment stack, the part we are about to discuss is usually referred to as the Aggregation & Orchestration Layer. However, I believe that the reason it can "aggregate" and "orchestrate" is because it sits on top of a robust and intricate infrastructure. Therefore, this layer should be placed at the very top of the financial integration layer.
Below the Aggregation & Orchestration Layer lies the core support for the entire fund flow, with the following three layers being key foundational modules that are frequently aggregated and orchestrated:
1. Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) Providers
These platforms offer modular financial infrastructure that allows companies to integrate services such as virtual bank accounts, card issuance, payment channels, and more.
They typically assist clients in completing compliance, back-office settlement, and other processes, enabling businesses to provide quasi-banking services in their products without holding a financial license themselves.
2. Over-the-Counter (OTC) Trading Platforms
OTC platforms specialize in handling large-volume transactions, serving as a bridge for companies that cannot directly interface with major exchanges or liquidity providers.
They can swiftly and efficiently facilitate bi-directional exchanges between stablecoins and fiat currencies, greatly simplifying the settlement process for large trades.
3. Liquidity Providers
Working closely with OTC platforms, they ensure sufficient fund availability and timely settlement for transactions globally. These institutions shield the complexity of fund movement between crypto and fiat currencies, allowing various applications to execute coin swaps, payments, and other operations through simple API calls.
Many companies are unwilling to self-custody millions of dollars' worth of stablecoins or other crypto assets. Therefore, custody service providers have become an indispensable foundational component. They offer regulated, insured, institutional-grade secure custody solutions, serving as the trust anchor for almost all crypto payment applications.
In the payment stack, Centralized Exchanges (CEXs) play a critical role, especially in the financial integration stage. They facilitate large-scale fiat-to-stablecoin settlements through liquidity provider integrations and mint/redeem services. These exchanges typically hold a portion of stablecoins and cash reserves to ensure smooth fund transfers for both parties.
At the bottom layer are the Mint & Redeem services, which form the foundation of the entire payment stack. Stablecoins exist because someone "mints" them, and others "redeem" them.
· Tether (USDT) operates its minting and redemption mechanism based on whitelisted partners who directly receive user bank transfers and exchange them for an equivalent amount of USDT.
·Circle (USDC) provides minting and redemption services through Circle Mint for companies that have completed KYB (Know Your Business) verification.
Final Summary: A Comprehensive Payment Stack Overview
The payment stack is dynamic and highly interconnected. Each layer relies on the tools, services, and providers behind it. Overall, the cryptocurrency payment stack looks like this:

Stablecoin-driven payments represent one of the most influential and easily adoptable real-world use cases for cryptocurrencies beyond Bitcoin as a store of value. @PlasmaFDN is a blockchain designed specifically for stablecoin payments and is well-positioned in this area. However, I expect that almost all blockchains will eventually pivot towards stablecoins and the payments space.
To achieve this goal, they must rethink their payment stack—simply being EVM-compatible is no longer sufficient.

In summary, stablecoins indeed present a trillion-dollar opportunity, and those who play key roles in the payment stack will reap the greatest rewards.

Source: Original Article Link
You may also like

SK Hynix Reportedly Plans U.S. ADR Listing as Early as August, With SEC Approval Possible in Late June
SK Hynix may pursue a U.S. ADR listing as early as August, with SEC approval reportedly possible in late June amid strong AI chip supply chain demand.

SpaceX vs Tesla vs xAI: Which Elon Musk Trade Has the Biggest Upside in 2026?

OpenAI Reveals It Has Confidentially Submitted an S-1 to the SEC, Keeping the Door Open for a Future IPO
On June 9, according to an OpenAI announcement, the company recently confidentially submitted a draft S-1 registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), beginning the preliminary compliance process for a potential initial public offering. OpenAI said it chose to disclose this proactively because it expected the news might leak; however, the company has not yet set a specific listing timeline, and related arrangements may still take some time.

Latest research from 13 top universities including Cornell University: The current state, challenges, and misconceptions of the fusion of Crypto and AI

Deconstructing Anthropic: The Best AI Company, Possibly Also a Type of Organizational Invention

Apollo and Blackstone Reportedly Back $35 Billion Anthropic Chip Financing as Deal Details Remain Unclear
On June 9, according to currently available news alerts, Apollo and Blackstone Group participated in a $35 billion financing for an Anthropic “chip project.” Based on the original wording of the report, the funding has already been raised, but public information remains limited. The financing structure, use of proceeds, project entity, and whether Apollo and Blackstone participated through equity, debt, or project financing have not yet been disclosed.

Humanity Protocol Security Incident Escalates: More Than $31 Million Stolen From Related Addresses as Attacker Continues Selling H for ETH
On June 9, according to monitoring by Onchain Lens, more than $31 million has been stolen from addresses linked to Humanity Protocol, and the attack is still ongoing, with the hacker continuously swapping H tokens for ETH. Project founder Terence Kwok later confirmed the security incident on X, saying the issue involved a private key leak.

Bloomberg: As Bitcoin Weakens, Stablecoins and RWA Continue to Drive Expansion in Crypto Businesses
In June, Bloomberg reported that despite Bitcoin falling below $60,000 last week, wiping out about $235 billion in market value within seven days, and dropping close to 50% from last year’s peak, some core businesses in the crypto industry are still expanding, mainly in stablecoins, real-world asset tokenization (RWA), payments, and infrastructure. The report also noted that overall altcoin activity has contracted significantly: altcoin market capitalization has fallen from a peak of about $431 billion in November 2021 to around $170 billion, and among the tens of millions of tokens issued in recent years, fewer than 1,700 still maintain meaningful trading activity.

Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?

Binance Research: RWA Market Expected to Expand Nearly 6x from Early 2025, with Public Equities and Onchain Payments Heating Up Together
In June, Binance Research said in its monthly market report that the real-world asset (RWA) market is expected to grow by about 589% from the beginning of 2025. Bond- and money market fund-related RWA expanded by about $6.5 billion, up 83% year over year, while publicly traded equity RWAs grew by about 422%. The report also noted that monthly crypto debit card transaction volume exceeded $747 million in May, up 48.6% year to date.

Japan to Assess a Framework for Yen Stablecoins and Crypto ETFs as Asia’s Compliant Payments Narrative Heats Up
Recently, according to the original report, Japan is considering the launch of yen stablecoins and cryptocurrency ETFs. Public information remains limited at this stage, and there is still no complete policy text, regulatory draft, or clear implementation timeline, so this is better characterized as a “policy discussion” rather than formal implementation. The original wording also noted that advancing stablecoin regulation in Asia is driving XRP usage and supporting growth in the XRPL ecosystem. However, based on currently available public information, there is not enough evidence to directly establish a clear causal relationship between this round of discussion in Japan and XRP or XRPL.

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
SK Hynix Reportedly Plans U.S. ADR Listing as Early as August, With SEC Approval Possible in Late June
SK Hynix may pursue a U.S. ADR listing as early as August, with SEC approval reportedly possible in late June amid strong AI chip supply chain demand.
SpaceX vs Tesla vs xAI: Which Elon Musk Trade Has the Biggest Upside in 2026?
OpenAI Reveals It Has Confidentially Submitted an S-1 to the SEC, Keeping the Door Open for a Future IPO
On June 9, according to an OpenAI announcement, the company recently confidentially submitted a draft S-1 registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), beginning the preliminary compliance process for a potential initial public offering. OpenAI said it chose to disclose this proactively because it expected the news might leak; however, the company has not yet set a specific listing timeline, and related arrangements may still take some time.
Latest research from 13 top universities including Cornell University: The current state, challenges, and misconceptions of the fusion of Crypto and AI
Deconstructing Anthropic: The Best AI Company, Possibly Also a Type of Organizational Invention
Apollo and Blackstone Reportedly Back $35 Billion Anthropic Chip Financing as Deal Details Remain Unclear
On June 9, according to currently available news alerts, Apollo and Blackstone Group participated in a $35 billion financing for an Anthropic “chip project.” Based on the original wording of the report, the funding has already been raised, but public information remains limited. The financing structure, use of proceeds, project entity, and whether Apollo and Blackstone participated through equity, debt, or project financing have not yet been disclosed.




