If Twitter disappeared tomorrow, what would happen to Crypto?
Original Article Title: Time to move on: CT breakup guide
Original Article Author: Ayca
Original Article Translation: Luffy, Foresight News
If Twitter disappeared overnight, what would happen? In an instant, 80% of crypto projects would also disappear, completely falling into silence.
Are you ready to face this reality?
Our Unacknowledged Twitter Addiction
Lately, I've been thinking about this issue. Crypto projects have developed a dangerous reliance on Twitter. We post project launch announcements on Twitter, build communities there, and all our marketing channels start from Twitter. But relying on a single platform is like putting all your eggs in the basket of a capricious billionaire.
Let's be honest, we have become extremely lazy. Twitter provides a quick dopamine fix, making us content with the status quo. We send out a few tweets, interact with a group of people in the crypto space, and then consider our day's work done.
But like any harmful relationship, this dependence is slowly suffocating your project.
True crypto users are not just on Twitter. They are everywhere: on Discord, Reddit, TikTok, Telegram, and on platforms you have not explored because of being too comfortable. The echo chamber effect in the "crypto Twitter" creates a false sense of security, making you think your influence is greater than it actually is.

Content Translation: Welcome to Web3! Here you will see: 1000 "consumer apps", 100 KOLs endorsing it, and 0 consumers
For most crypto teams, Twitter is not just a platform, it is the entire marketing plan.
"We're killing it in the crypto Twitter space" actually means "We have no idea how to reach real users."
One uncomfortable fact is this: Twitter is just a small town, not an entire city.

Understanding the Real User Journey
Think about how we make even the simplest purchasing decisions. We ask a trusted person or check social media.
Now imagine this: Someone wakes up and remembers a friend mentioned your project. Congratulations! You've just tapped into the Holy Grail of marketing: word of mouth.
But what happens next?
They will do a Google search, visit your website (likely not understanding a word of what's on there), look for reviews and news about you (yes, PR matters). They will delve into your social channels to see what people are saying; they may even check out your LinkedIn page. Only after been through all of this will they decide whether to purchase or engage with your project.

See the issue? This process spans multiple platforms, yet you've been solely relying on Twitter. You've been limiting your "circle of friends."
Your Crypto Project Needs a Platform Beyond Twitter
Here's a challenge for you: In the next 30 days, halve your project's posting frequency on Twitter. Use the time saved to build a presence on two other platforms you've never tried before. (Yes, LinkedIn counts.)
Give it a shot and track the results. If there's no change, you can always go back to Twitter and pretend none of this ever happened.

What do you stand to lose by taking on this challenge?
Just a few tweets with dismal engagement numbers that no one sees.
And what do you stand to gain?
A truly diversified brand that doesn't rely on a single platform, new users, and most importantly, a success story you can boast about for a whole year.
Leaving Twitter might make you uneasy for a while. But trust me, the new relationships you build on other platforms afterward will be well worth it.
Become That 1% Innovator

Your Marketing Strategy Could Be Meaningless Due to One Change in the Twitter Algorithm
If Twitter were to disappear tomorrow, could your project survive? Let's be honest.
Don't wait for a big setback to understand this lesson; relying on a single platform is like putting all your crypto assets in one wallet. It's reckless and unnecessary.
Diversity is not only a recommendation for your crypto portfolio, but it is also essential for crypto marketing. However, we have always put all our eggs in the Twitter basket, and then acted extremely surprised when the eggs broke.
It's time to say this: "Twitter, we need to talk about expanding to other platforms."
Your future users are waiting for you, just not where you have been constantly looking.
You may also like

Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight
Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.




